- Cost and Quality Problems
- Improving Value
- Advocate Resources
- State News
Nationally, consumer worry about healthcare affordability is well documented but now – for the first time—a new survey reveals how affordability concerns and ideas for action play out in Colorado.
A survey of more than 970 Colorado adults conducted from December 20, 2018 to January 2, 2019, found that:
Like many Americans, Colorado residents currently experience hardship due to high healthcare costs. All told, 58% of Colorado adults experienced one or more of the following healthcare affordability burdens in the prior 12 months.
1.) Being Uninsured Due to High Premium Costs
2.) Delaying or Foregoing Healthcare Due to Cost
Half (50%) of Colorado adults who needed healthcare during the year encountered one or more cost related barriers to getting that care. In descending order of frequency, they report the following healthcare short-cuts to deal with cost:
Moreover, cost was by far the most frequently cited reason (27%) for not getting needed medical care, exceeding a host of other possible barriers like transportation, difficulty getting an appointment, lack of childcare and other reasons.
Of the various types of medical bills, the ones most frequently associated with an affordability barrier were doctor bills, dental bills and prescription drugs, likely reflecting the frequency with which Colorado adults seek these services—or, in the case of dental, perhaps lower rates of coverage for these services.
More than one-third (39%) of Colorado adults experienced one or more of these struggles to pay their medical bills:
Even adults not currently facing a healthcare affordability burden report being worried about affording healthcare in the future.
Overall, four out of five (82%) Colorado adults reported being “worried” or “very worried” about affording one or more aspects of healthcare, such as:
In addition, respondents were “worried” or “very worried” about not being able to afford health insurance in the future (68%). The greatest concern was among those that buy private health coverage and those that have Medicaid (Health First Colorado)—more than three quarters of those adults expressed worry (see Figure 1). In light of low cost of coverage for Medicaid recipients, it is possible that fears of affordability were related to fears about losing this coverage. As Figure 1 shows, more than half of Medicaid recipients were worried about losing their coverage.
The survey also revealed some regional differences in how Colorado experience healthcare affordability burdens. Responses were mapped into the regions in Table 1.
Individuals outside the Denver Metro Region reported the greatest rate of healthcare affordability burdens-62% of adults had one or more of the three types of burdens described above. In contrast, the Denver metro region showed fewer affordability burdens, although still high, affecting more than half (56%) of adults (see Table 1)
Perhaps reflecting these high rates of healthcare affordability burdens, residents of Colorado were fairly similar with respect to healthcare worry across regions:
Perhaps most important, overall levels of worry about healthcare affordability exceeded 80% in both regions (Table 1).
Additional regional detail is available at healthcarevaluehub.org/Colorado-2019-healthcare-survey/
In light of these healthcare affordability concerns, it is not surprising that Colorado residents were extremely dissatisfied with the health system.Statewide:
Of more than 20 options, the options cited most frequently as being a “major reason” for high healthcare costs were:
When it comes to tackling costs, respondents endorsed a number of strategies:
What is remarkable about these findings is high support for change regardless of the respondent’s political affiliation (see Table 2).
While Colorado residents are united in calling for a role for government in addressing high healthcare costs, they also see a role for themselves:
The high burden of healthcare affordability, along with high levels of support for change, suggest that elected leaders and other stakeholders need to make this consumer burden a top priority. Annual surveys can help assess whether or not progress is being made.
Altarum’s Consumer Healthcare Experience State Survey (CHESS) is designed to elicit respondents’ unbiased views on a wide range of health system issues, including confidence using the health system, financial burden, and views on fixes that might be needed.
The survey used a web panel from SSI Research Now containing a demographically balanced sample of approximately 1,000 respondents who live in Colorado. The survey was conducted only in English and restricted to adults ages 18 and older. Respondents who finished the survey in less than half the median time were excluded from the final sample, leaving 971 cases for analysis with sample balancing occurring in age, gender and income to be demographically representative of Colorado. After those exclusions, the demographic composition of respondents is as follows.